Javascript must be enabled to continue!
 Sexism in Science: Changing the conversation with comics 
View through CrossRef
<p>Our comics are based on real events experienced by real people, but should never have happened. Some events are blatant, others are subtle, but all leave you wondering &#8220;<em>did this really happen?!</em>&#8221;. Sadly the answer is yes, and they continue to happen, with testimonies on everyday sexism, sexist biases, aggressions and microaggressions regularly received by our team.</p><p>Started in 2016, the <em>Did This Really Happen?!</em> project was created from the shared experiences of a group of largely female scientists who found themselves in a male-dominated environment. By 2018 the project had progressed to collecting anonymous accounts of sexism in science from across the world, turning them into comics to share and spark a conversation. In 2020, in reflecting on the project so far, it was clear sexism in science was not confined to one career level in academia, with around half of testimonies coming from PhD and Early Career Researchers, with the other half coming from mid to senior level scientists. Several themes also emerged which were documented in Bocher <em>et al</em>., 2020 and identified the following;</p><ul><li>treating women as objects (in 70% of testimonies)</li>
<li>questioning female competencies (in 61% of testimonies)</li>
<li>confining males to stereotypical roles (in 41% of testimonies)</li>
</ul><p>In 2021, the <em>DTRH?!</em> project was relaunched with new team members and a new illustrator as the career and life paths of the original team changed and evolved. Here we present how we aim to document and illustrate the widespread sexist attitudes that affect both women (and men) in science today, challenging this behaviour with humour and to inspire discussion.</p>
Title:  Sexism in Science: Changing the conversation with comics 
Description:
<p>Our comics are based on real events experienced by real people, but should never have happened.
Some events are blatant, others are subtle, but all leave you wondering &#8220;<em>did this really happen?!</em>&#8221;.
Sadly the answer is yes, and they continue to happen, with testimonies on everyday sexism, sexist biases, aggressions and microaggressions regularly received by our team.
</p><p>Started in 2016, the <em>Did This Really Happen?!</em> project was created from the shared experiences of a group of largely female scientists who found themselves in a male-dominated environment.
By 2018 the project had progressed to collecting anonymous accounts of sexism in science from across the world, turning them into comics to share and spark a conversation.
In 2020, in reflecting on the project so far, it was clear sexism in science was not confined to one career level in academia, with around half of testimonies coming from PhD and Early Career Researchers, with the other half coming from mid to senior level scientists.
Several themes also emerged which were documented in Bocher <em>et al</em>.
, 2020 and identified the following;</p><ul><li>treating women as objects (in 70% of testimonies)</li>
<li>questioning female competencies (in 61% of testimonies)</li>
<li>confining males to stereotypical roles (in 41% of testimonies)</li>
</ul><p>In 2021, the <em>DTRH?!</em> project was relaunched with new team members and a new illustrator as the career and life paths of the original team changed and evolved.
Here we present how we aim to document and illustrate the widespread sexist attitudes that affect both women (and men) in science today, challenging this behaviour with humour and to inspire discussion.
</p>.
Related Results
Focus on slow rotators - first results from stellar occultations campaign on long-period asteroids
Focus on slow rotators - first results from stellar occultations campaign on long-period asteroids
<p><strong>Most asteroids are slow rotators &#160;</strong> &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;...
Detection and characterisation of heterogeneities in the WISDOM/ExoMars 2022 radargrams.
Detection and characterisation of heterogeneities in the WISDOM/ExoMars 2022 radargrams.
 Introduction The principal objective of Rosalind Franklin, the ExoMars Rover, is to look for evidence of past or present life on Mars. Such evidence wou...
Ballistic landslides on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko
Ballistic landslides on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko
<p><strong>Introduction:</strong></p><p>The slow ejecta (i.e., with velocity lower than escape velocity) and l...
Case Study of Geological Risk Factors for Earthquake Hazard Mapping in the South Eastern Korea
Case Study of Geological Risk Factors for Earthquake Hazard Mapping in the South Eastern Korea
  In order to interpret geological risk assessment for Earthquake hazard by mapping work, since geotechnical...
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
North Syrian Mortaria and Other Late Roman Personal and Utility Objects Bearing Inscriptions of Good Luck
North Syrian Mortaria and Other Late Roman Personal and Utility Objects Bearing Inscriptions of Good Luck
<span style="font-size: 11pt; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'">ΠΗΛΙΝΑ ΙΓ&Delta...
The use of ERDDAP in a self-monitoring and nowcast hazard alerting coastal flood system
The use of ERDDAP in a self-monitoring and nowcast hazard alerting coastal flood system
<div>
<p>In the UK,&#160;&#163;150bn of assets and 4 million people are at risk from coastal flooding. With reductions in public funding...
Morphometry of an hexagonal pit crater in Pavonis Mons, Mars
Morphometry of an hexagonal pit crater in Pavonis Mons, Mars
<p><strong>Introduction:</strong></p>
<p>Pit craters are peculiar depressions found in almost every terrestria...

