Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Nations, nationality, and civil society in the work of Edward Shils

View through CrossRef
This chapter explores Shils’ original and highly nuanced treatment of the concepts of ‘nationality’, ‘nationalism’, and ‘civil society’. In particular, the chapter argues that Shils distinguishes between ‘nationality’ (which he seems to use as a synonym for ‘national self-consciousness’) and ‘nationalism’, which he identifies as an ideology. In this taxonomy, ‘nationality’ is a basic almost primordial force that provides the foundation for civil society and, ultimately, individual liberty. In this respect, nationality is a positive, or at the very least neutral, force. Shils portrays the ideology of nationalism, on the other hand, as highly dangerous. To put it simply, while regarding nationality as essential for civil society, Shils suggested that nationalism is in fact a danger to it. The chapter goes on to situate Shils’s theories of nations and nationalism with in the broader scholarly debate on these subjects. In the process, it examines Shils’s ideas concerning the relative antiquity of nations and the historical specifics about the origins of nationalism.
Manchester University Press
Title: Nations, nationality, and civil society in the work of Edward Shils
Description:
This chapter explores Shils’ original and highly nuanced treatment of the concepts of ‘nationality’, ‘nationalism’, and ‘civil society’.
In particular, the chapter argues that Shils distinguishes between ‘nationality’ (which he seems to use as a synonym for ‘national self-consciousness’) and ‘nationalism’, which he identifies as an ideology.
In this taxonomy, ‘nationality’ is a basic almost primordial force that provides the foundation for civil society and, ultimately, individual liberty.
In this respect, nationality is a positive, or at the very least neutral, force.
Shils portrays the ideology of nationalism, on the other hand, as highly dangerous.
To put it simply, while regarding nationality as essential for civil society, Shils suggested that nationalism is in fact a danger to it.
The chapter goes on to situate Shils’s theories of nations and nationalism with in the broader scholarly debate on these subjects.
In the process, it examines Shils’s ideas concerning the relative antiquity of nations and the historical specifics about the origins of nationalism.

Related Results

Respecting the Right to Nationality in International Sport
Respecting the Right to Nationality in International Sport
This paper questions whether international sports – using the International Olympic Committee (IOC) as the case study – fully respects the human right to a nationality. <br>&...
Edward Shils on pluralism and civility
Edward Shils on pluralism and civility
One place where Edward Shils’ writings remain prominent and particularly salient today is in contemporary debates over the concept of civility.  Shils has recently been characteriz...
Edward Shils and his Portraits
Edward Shils and his Portraits
Edward Shils’ Portraits offers various intellectual biographies of major figures that played a large role in his life, mainly at the University of Chicago. The list is diverse incl...
Santia Claim.
Santia Claim.
State responsibility — Claims — Nationality of — Right of dual national to claim under Treaty of Peace — Rule of non — protection of individual against State of nationality — Test ...
Concluding comments: Edward Shils – the ‘outsider’
Concluding comments: Edward Shils – the ‘outsider’
This concluding chapter builds upon the notion of “outsider” that Stephen Turner employed in his Introduction and it assesses Edward Shils’ life and his accomplishments. It is diff...
The Bona Fide Investor: Corporate Nationality and Treaty Shopping in Investment Treaty Law
The Bona Fide Investor: Corporate Nationality and Treaty Shopping in Investment Treaty Law
<p>This thesis addresses the problem of treaty shopping in investment treaty law. It seeks to illustrate how the problem stems from, and can in part be resolved by, the conce...
Edward Shils and Michael Polanyi: the terms of engagement
Edward Shils and Michael Polanyi: the terms of engagement
This essay examines the thirty-year personal and intellectual friendship of Edward Shils and Michael Polanyi. Shils identifies Polanyi as one of his three important mentors; he is ...

Back to Top