Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Spatial variability of greenhouse gas fluxes in two drained Northern peatlands
View through CrossRef
<p>Peatlands store large amounts of organic carbon, which is subject to microbial decomposition and mineralization to either CO<sub>2</sub> or CH<sub>4</sub>.&#160; Drained peatlands are characterized by large horizontal variability in soil water contents and saturation, with dryer parts closer to the drainage ditches. The greenhouse gas (GHG) production in these systems is expected to be sensitive to temperature, substrate chemistry, oxygen concentration thus on soil water contents. Methane production should take place in the wetter parts, while respiration should dominate in drier parts. The seasonality of weather conditions modulates the spatial variability. In this complex situation, we are interested in how the seasonal weather variability triggers the microbial processes in the different micro-topographical situations and how this affects the overall GHG budgets of such sites.</p><p>We investigate two neighboring, drained ombrotrophic bogs in Norway close to Trysil, Innlandet, 61.1N- 12.25E, 640 m a. s. l.. One site (South) on an upper slope is about 45 m higher than the other site (North) in a saddle like flattening. &#160;We use an automated chamber method to examine the seasonality of GHG production at microsites that cover some contrasting local situations with in the large range of small scale spatial heterogeneity. With eddy covariance CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> flux measurements, we integrate over a larger spatial scale, with, however, shifting footprints depending on weather conditions and wind direction. We present a comparative &#160;analysis of 1.5 years continuous measurements, where we examine shifting spatial patterns of GHG production at different scales and relate them to soil conditions.</p><p>While the CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes compared very well between the two investigated sites, the CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes in the lower and wetter of the two sites (North) was higher and their spatial variability was lower than in the South site. Only in the South site, the CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes correlated with the coverage of well drained versus less well drained areas. We will present results on how the spatial variability changed with the seasonality of soil temperatures and the water table.</p><p>The automated chambers (five chambers within each footprint of the eddy flux towers) showed higher spatial variability for CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes than for CO<sub>2</sub> with higher CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in the wetter plots furthest away from ditches, i.e. CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes correlate well to ground water depth at both sites. N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were observed in short events during the early summer season. Overall, there was a good alignment of fluxes measured with eddy flux and chamber technologies.</p><p>Information on factors that constrain the spatio-temporal variability are important for estimating areal GHG budgets and for predicting possible effects of peatland management, such as draining or re-wetting on the climate effects from these ecosystems. &#160;From the results, we expect higher effects of peatland restoration on GHG budgets in the South site.</p>
Title: Spatial variability of greenhouse gas fluxes in two drained Northern peatlands
Description:
<p>Peatlands store large amounts of organic carbon, which is subject to microbial decomposition and mineralization to either CO<sub>2</sub> or CH<sub>4</sub>.
&#160; Drained peatlands are characterized by large horizontal variability in soil water contents and saturation, with dryer parts closer to the drainage ditches.
The greenhouse gas (GHG) production in these systems is expected to be sensitive to temperature, substrate chemistry, oxygen concentration thus on soil water contents.
Methane production should take place in the wetter parts, while respiration should dominate in drier parts.
The seasonality of weather conditions modulates the spatial variability.
In this complex situation, we are interested in how the seasonal weather variability triggers the microbial processes in the different micro-topographical situations and how this affects the overall GHG budgets of such sites.
</p><p>We investigate two neighboring, drained ombrotrophic bogs in Norway close to Trysil, Innlandet, 61.
1N- 12.
25E, 640 m a.
s.
l.
One site (South) on an upper slope is about 45 m higher than the other site (North) in a saddle like flattening.
&#160;We use an automated chamber method to examine the seasonality of GHG production at microsites that cover some contrasting local situations with in the large range of small scale spatial heterogeneity.
With eddy covariance CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> flux measurements, we integrate over a larger spatial scale, with, however, shifting footprints depending on weather conditions and wind direction.
We present a comparative &#160;analysis of 1.
5 years continuous measurements, where we examine shifting spatial patterns of GHG production at different scales and relate them to soil conditions.
</p><p>While the CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes compared very well between the two investigated sites, the CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes in the lower and wetter of the two sites (North) was higher and their spatial variability was lower than in the South site.
Only in the South site, the CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes correlated with the coverage of well drained versus less well drained areas.
We will present results on how the spatial variability changed with the seasonality of soil temperatures and the water table.
</p><p>The automated chambers (five chambers within each footprint of the eddy flux towers) showed higher spatial variability for CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes than for CO<sub>2</sub> with higher CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in the wetter plots furthest away from ditches, i.
e.
CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes correlate well to ground water depth at both sites.
N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were observed in short events during the early summer season.
Overall, there was a good alignment of fluxes measured with eddy flux and chamber technologies.
</p><p>Information on factors that constrain the spatio-temporal variability are important for estimating areal GHG budgets and for predicting possible effects of peatland management, such as draining or re-wetting on the climate effects from these ecosystems.
&#160;From the results, we expect higher effects of peatland restoration on GHG budgets in the South site.
</p>.
Related Results
Drivers of CH4 flux quantity and variability in re-wetted European peatlands
Drivers of CH4 flux quantity and variability in re-wetted European peatlands
Peatlands cover ~3% of the global land surface, yet they store 21 – 30% of the world’s soil organic carbon. Large areas of pristine peatland have been drained t...
Seasonal and diurnal patterns in Greenhouse Gas fluxes from re-wetted European peatlands
Seasonal and diurnal patterns in Greenhouse Gas fluxes from re-wetted European peatlands
Peatlands represent 2.5% of all agricultural land in the EU, yet they account for ~ 25% of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and ~ 5% of total EU-wide GHG emissions. Sev...
Impacts of Rewetting Degraded Peatlands on Greenhouse Gas fluxes in West Kalimantan, Indonesia
Impacts of Rewetting Degraded Peatlands on Greenhouse Gas fluxes in West Kalimantan, Indonesia
Indonesia has more than 13 million hectares of peatlands, however almost half of them are degraded or drained, thereby emitting significant amounts of greenhouse gases (GHG). Peatl...
Modelling the effects of rewetting on peatland CH4 dynamics
Modelling the effects of rewetting on peatland CH4 dynamics
Undisturbed peatlands accumulate vast amounts of carbon in peat over long timescales. This is enabled by the presence of a high water table creating unfavourable conditions for org...
Carbon flux, energy balance and vegetation change of a recently restored forest peatland in the Solling mountains, Germany
Carbon flux, energy balance and vegetation change of a recently restored forest peatland in the Solling mountains, Germany
Peatlands represent the most space-effective and largest terrestrial carbon sink, delivering multiple crucial ecosystem services. In contrast, drained peatlands have been identifie...
Carbon dynamics of a controlled peatland restoration experiment in Norway
Carbon dynamics of a controlled peatland restoration experiment in Norway
Norway has the third greatest extent of peatlands in Europe, after Finland and Sweden. Norwegian peatlands cover nearly 30 000 km2 or 7.7 percent of Norway’s land area. H...
Questioning ten common assumptions about peatlands
Questioning ten common assumptions about peatlands
Peatlands have been widely studied in terms of their ecohydrology, carbon dynamics, ecosystem services and palaeoenvironmental archives. However, several assumptions are frequently...
Natural Heritages of The Black Sea Alpine: Agaçbaşı, Barma and Yılantas high Altitude peatlands, Nature Protected Areas, Trabzon, Turkey
Natural Heritages of The Black Sea Alpine: Agaçbaşı, Barma and Yılantas high Altitude peatlands, Nature Protected Areas, Trabzon, Turkey
Turkiye's largest high plateau peatlands, Trabzon peatlands are located in the Northeast part of Turkey, on the ridges and slopes of the hills of the Soğanlı Mountains which is one...

