Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Presuppositional Binding
View through CrossRef
This chapter discusses the notion of variable binding in theories of presupposition and focuses in particular on the so‐called binding problem of presuppositions. This problem was first formulated by Karttunen and Peters in 1979, discussed by various authors, and subsequently taken up by Heim 1983. The binding problem arises in pragmatic and two‐dimensional approaches, that is in theories that divorce the presuppositional contribution and the content of natural language sentences, and treat them along separate dimensions. The first part of this chapter discusses the fact that presuppositions are a prerequisite for interpretation by binding into open content expressions. In the second part we go into the binding problem in more detail and discuss in particular the two‐dimensional account of Karttunen and Peters, Heim's suggestions about local accommodation, and the way the problem is treated in the anaphoric account of presupposition. It transpires that on the latter account the binding problem does not arise. This is due to a quite intuitive and semantically motivated constraint known as trapping. Presuppositions have internal structure and may embed further presuppositions. Such embedded presuppositions may already be bound at some level of discourse structure. The trapping constraint assures that when such an embedded presupposition has been bound, its embedder can never be accommodated at any higher level of discourse. The reason is that accommodation of the embedder at any higher level would give rise to free variables that cannot access their antecedent anymore, and the resulting structure would thus lack an interpretation.
Title: Presuppositional Binding
Description:
This chapter discusses the notion of variable binding in theories of presupposition and focuses in particular on the so‐called binding problem of presuppositions.
This problem was first formulated by Karttunen and Peters in 1979, discussed by various authors, and subsequently taken up by Heim 1983.
The binding problem arises in pragmatic and two‐dimensional approaches, that is in theories that divorce the presuppositional contribution and the content of natural language sentences, and treat them along separate dimensions.
The first part of this chapter discusses the fact that presuppositions are a prerequisite for interpretation by binding into open content expressions.
In the second part we go into the binding problem in more detail and discuss in particular the two‐dimensional account of Karttunen and Peters, Heim's suggestions about local accommodation, and the way the problem is treated in the anaphoric account of presupposition.
It transpires that on the latter account the binding problem does not arise.
This is due to a quite intuitive and semantically motivated constraint known as trapping.
Presuppositions have internal structure and may embed further presuppositions.
Such embedded presuppositions may already be bound at some level of discourse structure.
The trapping constraint assures that when such an embedded presupposition has been bound, its embedder can never be accommodated at any higher level of discourse.
The reason is that accommodation of the embedder at any higher level would give rise to free variables that cannot access their antecedent anymore, and the resulting structure would thus lack an interpretation.
Related Results
Presupposition
Presupposition
Presupposition, broadly conceived, is a type of inference associated with utterances of natural-language sentences. Presuppositional inferences are distinguished from other kinds o...
The Nature of Man and Educational Administration: a Ternary Function
The Nature of Man and Educational Administration: a Ternary Function
Problem. There appears to be a growing uneasiness with much of current educational administrative theory and practice. It is hypothesized that this is largely due to inadequacies o...
GAI MoRFs Regulate Cleft and Channel Binding Pathways for Gibberellin in GID1A
GAI MoRFs Regulate Cleft and Channel Binding Pathways for Gibberellin in GID1A
Abstract
The hormone gibberellin (GA) promotes arabidopsis growth by enhancing binding between GA Insensitive DELLA transcriptional repressor...
Environmental Surveillance Protocols for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) v2
Environmental Surveillance Protocols for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) v2
EnvironmentalSurveillance Protocols for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) This comprehensive protocol suite enables systematic environmental surveillance for avian influenza...
Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein inhibits DNA binding by the retinoblastoma gene product.
Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein inhibits DNA binding by the retinoblastoma gene product.
The human papillomavirus E7 gene can transform murine fibroblasts and cooperate with other viral oncogenes in transforming primary cell cultures. One biochemical property associate...
Receptor Identification and Characterization
Receptor Identification and Characterization
Abstract
The sections in this article are:
Identification of Receptors Based on Functional Properties
...
Residues Neighboring an SH3-Binding Motif Participate in the Interaction
In Vivo
Residues Neighboring an SH3-Binding Motif Participate in the Interaction
In Vivo
Abstract
In signaling networks, protein-protein interactions are often mediated by modular domains that bind short linear motifs. The motifs’ seq...
Temple Theology
Temple Theology
AbstractAt the outset of the literary work of the Society for Pentecostal Studies it is prudential to raise the issue of theological direction. What kind of theology characterizes ...

