Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The archaeology of the Roman fullonica

View through CrossRef
In JRA 15 (2002) 20-44, M. Bradley argued that Roman fullers were not involved in the finishing of cloth as part of the textile-manufacturing process, but acted solely as commercial laundrymen; further, he questioned the archaeological evidence used to identify fulleries. His paper contains a number of misconceptions, especially in the use of archaeological evidence.Bradley attempts to argue that Roman fullers washed clothes, both new and worn, for other people, but that they did not form part of the manufacturing or finishing process of new goods before they were sold to the customer. I am not convinced that the evidence permits this conclusion, although I agree that service cleaning was an important part of their work. The nature of the genres of literary evidence surviving from antiquity is such that most writers would be unlikely to concern themselves with the place of fulling within the operations of textile-production and finishing; they are much more likely to refer to fulling in the context of operations more directly familiar to them or their readers, that is, the commercial cleaning aspect.Bradley writes (22):Diocletian's Prices Edict, with its individual pricings, certainly does not appeal to the logic of industrial wholesale; more likely, it was customary for an individual to purchase a rude uestimentum and then to put it through a series of ‘finishing’ services of his choice which included washing (and therefore initial shrinking of the fabric), combing, bleaching, dyeing and pressing (some or all of which were offered by the fullo).
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: The archaeology of the Roman fullonica
Description:
In JRA 15 (2002) 20-44, M.
Bradley argued that Roman fullers were not involved in the finishing of cloth as part of the textile-manufacturing process, but acted solely as commercial laundrymen; further, he questioned the archaeological evidence used to identify fulleries.
His paper contains a number of misconceptions, especially in the use of archaeological evidence.
Bradley attempts to argue that Roman fullers washed clothes, both new and worn, for other people, but that they did not form part of the manufacturing or finishing process of new goods before they were sold to the customer.
I am not convinced that the evidence permits this conclusion, although I agree that service cleaning was an important part of their work.
The nature of the genres of literary evidence surviving from antiquity is such that most writers would be unlikely to concern themselves with the place of fulling within the operations of textile-production and finishing; they are much more likely to refer to fulling in the context of operations more directly familiar to them or their readers, that is, the commercial cleaning aspect.
Bradley writes (22):Diocletian's Prices Edict, with its individual pricings, certainly does not appeal to the logic of industrial wholesale; more likely, it was customary for an individual to purchase a rude uestimentum and then to put it through a series of ‘finishing’ services of his choice which included washing (and therefore initial shrinking of the fabric), combing, bleaching, dyeing and pressing (some or all of which were offered by the fullo).

Related Results

Fullones and Roman society: a reconsideration
Fullones and Roman society: a reconsideration
Among the most significant material evidence for manufacturing and production activities in Roman towns are the remains of workshops dedicated to fulling. The layout of these so-ca...
Towards a Prosthetic Archaeology
Towards a Prosthetic Archaeology
Prosthetic archaeology is a theoretical proposal for a materially oriented digital practice. It is based on a critical approach to implementing the latest technologies in archaeolo...
Radical Media Archaeology (its epistemology, aesthetics and case studies)
Radical Media Archaeology (its epistemology, aesthetics and case studies)
Media Archaeology is both a method and an aesthetics of approaching technical objects. Within a broad range of such academic and artistic practices, radical media archaeology will ...
Archaeology within, archaeology without
Archaeology within, archaeology without
AbstractThe rise of the nation state has had a major influence on the development of archaeology. Nation states today, however, differ from their 19th- and 20th-century equivalents...
Social archaeology and the theatres of memory
Social archaeology and the theatres of memory
Archaeology is a study of ways in which we express ourselves through the things that we make and use, collect, discard and take for granted, all archaeology is social archaeology. ...
The Sustainable Management of Cultural Heritage Sites: Tourism and the Politics of Archaeology at Petra
The Sustainable Management of Cultural Heritage Sites: Tourism and the Politics of Archaeology at Petra
Jordan is a country rich with history, both modern and ancient, and its ancient past is best reflected by the thousands of archaeological sites peppered within its borders. Tourist...
Struggling with a Roman inheritance. A response to Versluys
Struggling with a Roman inheritance. A response to Versluys
I am very grateful to Miguel John Versluys for this paper, which raises several important issues that derive from current debates in Roman archaeology. I am aware of the context of...
Türk Roman Eleştirisinde İki Kadın: Suat Derviş ve Behice Boran'ın Roman Eleştir
Türk Roman Eleştirisinde İki Kadın: Suat Derviş ve Behice Boran'ın Roman Eleştir
Bu makale, Suat Derviş ve Behice Boran’ın, 1940’ların başında yazdıkları roman eleştirilerini karşılaştırmayı hedeflemektedir. Kendisi de roman yazarı olan Suat Derviş, bir dönem ç...

Back to Top