Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Borys Hrynchenko and Fedyr Matushevsky: epistolary dialogue

View through CrossRef
The complex of mutual correspondence between Borys Dmytrovych Hrinchenko and Fedir Pavlovich Matushevskyi - well-known public figures, representatives of the Ukrainian national movement of the beginning of the 20th century is analyzed in article. The content and source value of the epistolary dated 1902-1910 were studied. Texts of autographs of individual epistles are added to the article. The purpose of the research is to determine the thematic range, informational potential and source value of the correspondence for the study of the social and cultural life of Ukraine at the beginning of the 20th century, as well as to clarify the key stages of the life path of the respondents. Research methodology. The article is written on the basis of the principles of historicism, scientificity and systematicity. General historical and source research methods are applied: analytical, synthetic, chronological, heuristic, critical, archeographic and others. The scientific novelty is due to the lack of a comprehensive study of the correspondence of Borys Hrinchenko and Fedir Matushevsky, the need to involve it in scientific circulation. Conclusions. It has been established that the complex of correspondence between Borys Hrinchenko and Fedir Matushevsky has a small volume, but this does not diminish its value as a historical source. The thematic range and informational potential of the epistolary have been determined. Its significance for the study of the public life of Ukraine at the beginning of the 20th century, clarification of the facts of the respondents' biographies, is revealed. The analysis of the correspondence provides an opportunity to investigate the publishing activities of the figures and the working conditions of the Ukrainian intelligentsia at the beginning of the 20th century. An important topic in the correspondence is the discussion of the events that took place in Kyiv region, Chernihiv region and Kharkiv region as a result of the 1905 revolution.
Title: Borys Hrynchenko and Fedyr Matushevsky: epistolary dialogue
Description:
The complex of mutual correspondence between Borys Dmytrovych Hrinchenko and Fedir Pavlovich Matushevskyi - well-known public figures, representatives of the Ukrainian national movement of the beginning of the 20th century is analyzed in article.
The content and source value of the epistolary dated 1902-1910 were studied.
Texts of autographs of individual epistles are added to the article.
The purpose of the research is to determine the thematic range, informational potential and source value of the correspondence for the study of the social and cultural life of Ukraine at the beginning of the 20th century, as well as to clarify the key stages of the life path of the respondents.
Research methodology.
The article is written on the basis of the principles of historicism, scientificity and systematicity.
General historical and source research methods are applied: analytical, synthetic, chronological, heuristic, critical, archeographic and others.
The scientific novelty is due to the lack of a comprehensive study of the correspondence of Borys Hrinchenko and Fedir Matushevsky, the need to involve it in scientific circulation.
Conclusions.
It has been established that the complex of correspondence between Borys Hrinchenko and Fedir Matushevsky has a small volume, but this does not diminish its value as a historical source.
The thematic range and informational potential of the epistolary have been determined.
Its significance for the study of the public life of Ukraine at the beginning of the 20th century, clarification of the facts of the respondents' biographies, is revealed.
The analysis of the correspondence provides an opportunity to investigate the publishing activities of the figures and the working conditions of the Ukrainian intelligentsia at the beginning of the 20th century.
An important topic in the correspondence is the discussion of the events that took place in Kyiv region, Chernihiv region and Kharkiv region as a result of the 1905 revolution.

Related Results

Epistolary communication: the semiotic dimension
Epistolary communication: the semiotic dimension
The article presents an original approach to the analysis of epistolary communication of the Ukrainian intelligentsia of the late XIX - early XX centuries from the standpoint of se...
Dialogue on Film and Philosophy
Dialogue on Film and Philosophy
Editors' Preface When Ulf Wilhelmsson first contacted us about including his "Dialogue on Film and Philosophy" in the M/C 'chat' issue, we were initially taken aback. True, t...
"The back-and-forth form" : epistolarity in late medieval literature
"The back-and-forth form" : epistolarity in late medieval literature
The project explores medieval epistolarity as a medium and genre. I examine the body of rhetorical theory that described the purpose and form of the letter, the ars dictaminis. I a...
Epistolary Women: Navigating Ethnicity and Authenticity in Ana Castillo'sMixquiahuala Lettersand Hualing Nieh'sMulberry and Peach
Epistolary Women: Navigating Ethnicity and Authenticity in Ana Castillo'sMixquiahuala Lettersand Hualing Nieh'sMulberry and Peach
The epistolary genre suggests its own authenticity, asking the reader to suspend disbelief and to treat the letters that compose its pages as historical artifact. Similarly, ethnic...
Rational Dialogues and Its Constructive Social-Cultural Functions
Rational Dialogues and Its Constructive Social-Cultural Functions
One of the tools that human civilizations use today to understand each other and resolve misunderstandings is dialogue. Dialogue can reduce social distances and bridge human and cu...
Philosophy, Ethics and Dialogue
Philosophy, Ethics and Dialogue
Here, I examine the nature of ethical dialogue from the point of view of its foundations in the critique of the dominant, disinterested conception of ethics, relating this to my 20...

Back to Top