Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Degree of cure of orthodontic composite attachments underneath aligners

View through CrossRef
AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess the percentage degree of cure (DC%) of 2‐mm‐thick resin composite attachments used for aligner treatment. Three types of aligner – two thermoformed aligners (Clear Aligner [CLA], polyethylene terephthalate glycol modified; and Invisalign [INV], polyester urethane) and a three‐dimensional‐printed aligner (Graphy TC‐85DAC [GRP], an acrylate‐methacrylate copolymer) – were selected, along with two universal resin composites (3M Filtek Universal [FTU] and Charisma Topaz ONE [CTO]). Samples of each composite were placed under each aligner, and the degree of cure of each composite was evaluated on the top (facing the aligner) and the bottom (facing the substrate) attachment surfaces after curing. Five specimens were used per combination of aligner and composite, and an additional group of composites irradiated without aligners served as the control. The DC% measurements were performed using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR‐FTIR) spectroscopy. The DC% across the aligners were (median values) 33.8%–44.8% for CLA, 33.6%–40.8% for INV, 32.8%–40.6% for GRP, and 40.0%–51.7% for the control group. The DC% values of the attachments cured under any aligner were significantly lower than that of the corresponding control, with the values recorded on the top surfaces being 6% higher than those on the bottom surfaces after adjusting for aligner group and composite type.
Title: Degree of cure of orthodontic composite attachments underneath aligners
Description:
AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess the percentage degree of cure (DC%) of 2‐mm‐thick resin composite attachments used for aligner treatment.
Three types of aligner – two thermoformed aligners (Clear Aligner [CLA], polyethylene terephthalate glycol modified; and Invisalign [INV], polyester urethane) and a three‐dimensional‐printed aligner (Graphy TC‐85DAC [GRP], an acrylate‐methacrylate copolymer) – were selected, along with two universal resin composites (3M Filtek Universal [FTU] and Charisma Topaz ONE [CTO]).
Samples of each composite were placed under each aligner, and the degree of cure of each composite was evaluated on the top (facing the aligner) and the bottom (facing the substrate) attachment surfaces after curing.
Five specimens were used per combination of aligner and composite, and an additional group of composites irradiated without aligners served as the control.
The DC% measurements were performed using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR‐FTIR) spectroscopy.
The DC% across the aligners were (median values) 33.
8%–44.
8% for CLA, 33.
6%–40.
8% for INV, 32.
8%–40.
6% for GRP, and 40.
0%–51.
7% for the control group.
The DC% values of the attachments cured under any aligner were significantly lower than that of the corresponding control, with the values recorded on the top surfaces being 6% higher than those on the bottom surfaces after adjusting for aligner group and composite type.

Related Results

Comparison of Optical Properties of Clear Aligners Before and After In-vivo Aging
Comparison of Optical Properties of Clear Aligners Before and After In-vivo Aging
Introduction: There is a rising demand for clear aligners among orthodontic patients and after the expiry of Invisalign patent many indigenous aligners have been introduced in seve...
Physical and chemical changes of clear aligners after thermoforming and intraoral exposure
Physical and chemical changes of clear aligners after thermoforming and intraoral exposure
Objectives: This study assessed the physical and chemical changes of clear aligners after thermoforming and intraoral exposure. Material and Methods: This ex vivo study evaluated...
Aligners: General Characteristics, Advantages, and Disadvantages (Review)
Aligners: General Characteristics, Advantages, and Disadvantages (Review)
Abstract. In the past decade, removable orthodontic thermoplastic appliances—aligners—have become a widespread alternative to traditional fixed systems and orthodontic devices desi...
Assessing the Pros and Cons of Performing Orthognathic Surgery in Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Aligner Treatment
Assessing the Pros and Cons of Performing Orthognathic Surgery in Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Aligner Treatment
Objective: Orthodontic aligners have become one of the most requested treatments by patients. This study evaluated maxillofacial surgeons´ experience of using orthodontic aligners ...
Periodontal Implications of Orthodontic Treatment: Assessment of The Balance between Tooth Movement and Surrounding Tissue
Periodontal Implications of Orthodontic Treatment: Assessment of The Balance between Tooth Movement and Surrounding Tissue
Orthodontic treatment also aims to maintain ideal periodontal health. Gingival/periodontal conditions and orthodontic interventions have a complicated relationship because orthodon...

Back to Top