Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Platonism vs. Naturalism

View through CrossRef
This chapter distinguishes between Platonism and Naturalism. Plato's Platonism rests upon the foundation of his rejection of many, though not all, of the doctrines of his major predecessors. These include materialism, mechanism, nominalism, relativism, and skepticism. Plato rejects all these views with arguments, sometimes very elaborate and sometimes quite concise. All these negative arguments make up the foundation of Platonism. Meanwhile, the central pillar of the positive construct on the basis of this foundation is clear and unambiguous. It is an “unhypothetical first principle of all” called in Republic “the Idea of the Good” and, according to Aristotle's testimony, identified by Plato with “the One.” However, many contemporary philosophers embrace an opposing position, widely labeled “Naturalism.” Strikingly, many of the arguments for this position are arguments against elements of Platonism. The chapter then looks at attempts to seek a rapprochement between Platonism and Naturalism.
Title: Platonism vs. Naturalism
Description:
This chapter distinguishes between Platonism and Naturalism.
Plato's Platonism rests upon the foundation of his rejection of many, though not all, of the doctrines of his major predecessors.
These include materialism, mechanism, nominalism, relativism, and skepticism.
Plato rejects all these views with arguments, sometimes very elaborate and sometimes quite concise.
All these negative arguments make up the foundation of Platonism.
Meanwhile, the central pillar of the positive construct on the basis of this foundation is clear and unambiguous.
It is an “unhypothetical first principle of all” called in Republic “the Idea of the Good” and, according to Aristotle's testimony, identified by Plato with “the One.
” However, many contemporary philosophers embrace an opposing position, widely labeled “Naturalism.
” Strikingly, many of the arguments for this position are arguments against elements of Platonism.
The chapter then looks at attempts to seek a rapprochement between Platonism and Naturalism.

Related Results

Comments on Ayers ‘Spinoza, Platonism and Naturalism’
Comments on Ayers ‘Spinoza, Platonism and Naturalism’
This chapter comments on Michael Ayers’ chapter on the strands of Platonism and naturalism in philosopher Baruch Spinoza’s metaphysics. It explains the sources of Spinoza’s Platoni...
Social naturalism as methodological basis for scientific research on the identity of the perpetrator
Social naturalism as methodological basis for scientific research on the identity of the perpetrator
The article deals with problematic issues of criminological study of the perpetrator’s identity. The main attention is paid to the methodological aspects of this phenomenon. By the...
Naturalism in ethics
Naturalism in ethics
Ethical naturalism is the project of fitting an account of ethics into a naturalistic worldview. It includes nihilistic theories, which see no place for real values and no successf...
Practice of Naturalism in Naguib Mahfouz’s Midaq Alley
Practice of Naturalism in Naguib Mahfouz’s Midaq Alley
Naturalism novels portray the reality of life in a sharper and more decisive way than realism novels. Naturalism takes the place of building a narrative, like shooting a photograph...
Liberal Naturalism without Reenchantment
Liberal Naturalism without Reenchantment
There is a close conceptual relation between the notions of religious disenchantment and scientific naturalism. One way of resisting philosophical and cultural implications of the ...
Middle Platonism
Middle Platonism
The term “Middle Platonism” was created in the 19th century ce to distinguish this movement from the later tradition known as “Neoplatonism.” Both terms, however, are misleading an...
Identity of the Perpetrator in the Context of Modernization of Theory and Practice Counteracting Criminality
Identity of the Perpetrator in the Context of Modernization of Theory and Practice Counteracting Criminality
The development of criminology in the conditions of globalization and the growth of social conflicts, forced to look for effective methods of resolving complex criminological proble...
How Naturalism Refutes Itself: Pragmatist Challenges for Naturalism (William James and Charles Sanders Peirce)
How Naturalism Refutes Itself: Pragmatist Challenges for Naturalism (William James and Charles Sanders Peirce)
This paper examines how radical naturalism, when defined as an ontological position grounded exclusively in the scientific method, is ultimately self-refuting. Drawing on the works...

Back to Top