Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

CURRENT QUALITY OF CROSSREF METADATA IN MACEDONIAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS (2025)

View through CrossRef
Introduction: When a publisher registers a DOI with Crossref, they are also expected to submit associated metadata—structured information about the content, such as the title, authors, publication date, abstract, funding data, references, ORCID iDs, and more. We aimed to analyse the current quality of Crossref Metadata in Macedonian scientific journals, and to suggest mechanisms for increase of the Crossref metadata quality in Macedonian scientific journals. Methods: On February 15, 2025, an analysis was conducted using Crossref's "Participation Reports – How good is your metadata?" tool (https://www.crossref.org/members/prep/) to identify publishers from the Republic of North Macedonia depositing Crossref metadata. The analysis, which focused exclusively on journal articles using the “All time” option (excluding books, book chapters, proceedings, and conference papers), revealed a total of 37 publishers and one co-publisher—Sciendo, De Gruyter Poland Sp. z o.o., based in Warsaw, Poland. Altogether, 37,595 registered content items from these Macedonian publishers were included in the evaluation. Results: The 2025 analysis of Crossref metadata in Macedonian scientific journals shows limited participation, with only 37 out of around 140 publishers represented. DOI deposits are led by a few key institutions, but reference, ORCID iD, affiliation, funding, and Crossmark metadata are largely missing, especially from major public universities. Abstracts are more widely deposited, though inconsistently across institutions. Text mining, license URLs, and similarity checks are poorly implemented, and no publishers have submitted ROR identifiers. Only three journals published via De Gruyter demonstrate strong metadata quality in several areas, but still lack key elements like ORCID, ROR, and funding data. Discussion: Current Crossref metadata quality in Macedonian scientific journals (2025) is very low. Only smaller part of Macedonian scientific journals uses DOI numbers. Most of the Macedonian scientific journals do not deposit Crossref metadata services (Metadata Retrieval, Content Registration, Reference linking, Cited-by, Funder Registry, Similarity Check, Crossmark).
Title: CURRENT QUALITY OF CROSSREF METADATA IN MACEDONIAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS (2025)
Description:
Introduction: When a publisher registers a DOI with Crossref, they are also expected to submit associated metadata—structured information about the content, such as the title, authors, publication date, abstract, funding data, references, ORCID iDs, and more.
We aimed to analyse the current quality of Crossref Metadata in Macedonian scientific journals, and to suggest mechanisms for increase of the Crossref metadata quality in Macedonian scientific journals.
Methods: On February 15, 2025, an analysis was conducted using Crossref's "Participation Reports – How good is your metadata?" tool (https://www.
crossref.
org/members/prep/) to identify publishers from the Republic of North Macedonia depositing Crossref metadata.
The analysis, which focused exclusively on journal articles using the “All time” option (excluding books, book chapters, proceedings, and conference papers), revealed a total of 37 publishers and one co-publisher—Sciendo, De Gruyter Poland Sp.
z o.
o.
, based in Warsaw, Poland.
Altogether, 37,595 registered content items from these Macedonian publishers were included in the evaluation.
Results: The 2025 analysis of Crossref metadata in Macedonian scientific journals shows limited participation, with only 37 out of around 140 publishers represented.
DOI deposits are led by a few key institutions, but reference, ORCID iD, affiliation, funding, and Crossmark metadata are largely missing, especially from major public universities.
Abstracts are more widely deposited, though inconsistently across institutions.
Text mining, license URLs, and similarity checks are poorly implemented, and no publishers have submitted ROR identifiers.
Only three journals published via De Gruyter demonstrate strong metadata quality in several areas, but still lack key elements like ORCID, ROR, and funding data.
Discussion: Current Crossref metadata quality in Macedonian scientific journals (2025) is very low.
Only smaller part of Macedonian scientific journals uses DOI numbers.
Most of the Macedonian scientific journals do not deposit Crossref metadata services (Metadata Retrieval, Content Registration, Reference linking, Cited-by, Funder Registry, Similarity Check, Crossmark).

Related Results

Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Fabrication and characterization of c-Si/porous-Si/CdS/ZnxCd1-xO heterojunctions for applications in nanostructured solar cells
Fabrication and characterization of c-Si/porous-Si/CdS/ZnxCd1-xO heterojunctions for applications in nanostructured solar cells
Solar cells based on c-Si/porous-Si/CdS/ZnxCd1-xO heterojunctions were synthesized by depositing CdS films on c-Si/porous-Si (PS) substrates by electrochemical deposition (ED). PS ...
Literature Review on Metadata Governance
Literature Review on Metadata Governance
The framework of metadata governance is a subset of the primary data governance framework implementation within an enterprise. Metadata management helps identify data provenance an...
FAIR Digital Objects in Official Statistics
FAIR Digital Objects in Official Statistics
Introduction*1 Statistical offices on national and international scale provide statistics on demography, labour, income, society, economy, environment and othe...
The structure of thermally reduced graphene oxide
The structure of thermally reduced graphene oxide
The paper focused on the description of the reduced graphene oxide (rGO) structure. This material is obtained from a multistage production process. Each of these stages has a large...
Ontomet
Ontomet
Proper description of data, or metadata, is important to facilitate data sharing among Geospatial Information Communities. To avoid the production of arbitrary metadata annotations...
Globally Findable Planetary Data: The Interdisciplinary TRR170-DB Repository
Globally Findable Planetary Data: The Interdisciplinary TRR170-DB Repository
Introduction: The TRR170-DB data repository (https://planetary-data-portal.org/) manages the research data from the collaborative research center ‘Late Accretion onto Ter...

Back to Top