Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

In vitro Comparison of the Microhardness of Lithium Disilicate and Monolithic and Multilayered Fixed Prosthodontic Materials

View through CrossRef
Micro-hardness is a fundamental property of prosthodontic restorative materials, as it affects their resistance to surface deformation, wear, and long-term clinical performance. This study aimed to compare the Vickers micro-hardness of three widely used CAD/CAM materials: lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and multilayered zirconia. A total of 30 specimens (N = 30) were fabricated, with 10 samples allocated to each material group. Lithium disilicate specimens were prepared as rectangular plates (18 × 15 × 1 mm), whereas zirconia specimens—both monolithic and multilayered—were fabricated as discs (10 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm in thickness) following standardized CAD/CAM milling and sintering protocols. Vickers micro-hardness testing was conducted using a digital micro-hardness tester under material-specific conditions: a load of 1 kg and a dwell time of 10 s for lithium disilicate, and a load of 500 g with a 20 s dwell time for zirconia. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, with the significance level set at p < 0.05. Significant differences in micro-hardness were identified among the three materials (p < 0.001). Monolithic zirconia demonstrated the highest mean hardness (680 ± 19 HV), followed by multilayered zirconia (623 ± 47 HV), while lithium disilicate exhibited the lowest values (553 ± 32 HV). Post-hoc analysis confirmed that all pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. The findings indicate that monolithic zirconia possesses superior micro-hardness compared to multilayered zirconia and lithium disilicate, supporting its suitability for high-stress clinical applications. Multilayered zirconia offers a balance between mechanical performance and esthetics, whereas lithium disilicate remains optimal for highly esthetic anterior restorations. These results provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance for selecting CAD/CAM materials in fixed prosthodontic rehabilitation.
Title: In vitro Comparison of the Microhardness of Lithium Disilicate and Monolithic and Multilayered Fixed Prosthodontic Materials
Description:
Micro-hardness is a fundamental property of prosthodontic restorative materials, as it affects their resistance to surface deformation, wear, and long-term clinical performance.
This study aimed to compare the Vickers micro-hardness of three widely used CAD/CAM materials: lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and multilayered zirconia.
A total of 30 specimens (N = 30) were fabricated, with 10 samples allocated to each material group.
Lithium disilicate specimens were prepared as rectangular plates (18 × 15 × 1 mm), whereas zirconia specimens—both monolithic and multilayered—were fabricated as discs (10 mm in diameter and 1.
5 mm in thickness) following standardized CAD/CAM milling and sintering protocols.
Vickers micro-hardness testing was conducted using a digital micro-hardness tester under material-specific conditions: a load of 1 kg and a dwell time of 10 s for lithium disilicate, and a load of 500 g with a 20 s dwell time for zirconia.
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, with the significance level set at p < 0.
05.
Significant differences in micro-hardness were identified among the three materials (p < 0.
001).
Monolithic zirconia demonstrated the highest mean hardness (680 ± 19 HV), followed by multilayered zirconia (623 ± 47 HV), while lithium disilicate exhibited the lowest values (553 ± 32 HV).
Post-hoc analysis confirmed that all pairwise comparisons were statistically significant.
The findings indicate that monolithic zirconia possesses superior micro-hardness compared to multilayered zirconia and lithium disilicate, supporting its suitability for high-stress clinical applications.
Multilayered zirconia offers a balance between mechanical performance and esthetics, whereas lithium disilicate remains optimal for highly esthetic anterior restorations.
These results provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance for selecting CAD/CAM materials in fixed prosthodontic rehabilitation.

Related Results

Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials
Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials
AbstractPurposeTo evaluate the marginal fit of CAD/CAM copings milled from hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic) blocks and lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) blocks, and to evaluate the ef...
Evaluation and Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Lithium Disilicate-Based CAD/CAM Blocks
Evaluation and Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Lithium Disilicate-Based CAD/CAM Blocks
Lithium disilicate are commonly used in dental restoration due to its aesthetic and mechanical performance. However, the patent expiration of the IPS emax system has led to the eme...
Lithium Prospectivity in the Northeast German and Thuringian Ba-sins
Lithium Prospectivity in the Northeast German and Thuringian Ba-sins
Over the years many boreholes have been drilled into the Northeast German Basin (NEGB) in pursuit of the exploration of hydrocarbons. As well as gaining important information regar...
Evaluation of Fracture Toughness of Monolithic and Multilayered Zirconia for Prosthodontic Restorations: An In-Vitro Study
Evaluation of Fracture Toughness of Monolithic and Multilayered Zirconia for Prosthodontic Restorations: An In-Vitro Study
The purpose of this in-vitro study was to compare the fracture toughness of monolithic zirconia and multilayered zirconia, two commonly used materials in prosthodontic restorations...
Microleakage of Lithium Disilicate Crown Margins Finished on Direct Restorative Materials
Microleakage of Lithium Disilicate Crown Margins Finished on Direct Restorative Materials
SUMMARY Objective: For some esthetic clinical situations, it is necessary to finish crown margins on direct restorative materials to preserve tissue integrity, b...
Health-related quality of life after prosthodontic rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19-associated mucormycosis: A systematic review
Health-related quality of life after prosthodontic rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19-associated mucormycosis: A systematic review
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures an individual’s ability to function optimally in various aspects of life and their subjective sense of well-being across the physica...
Vertical marginal fit of advanced lithium disilicate crowns: an in- vitro study
Vertical marginal fit of advanced lithium disilicate crowns: an in- vitro study
Abstract Statement of the problem The clinical performance of ceramic crowns is influenced by overall marginal adaptation...

Back to Top