Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Anaphora in Dravidian

View through CrossRef
Abstract The Dravidian languages have a long-distance reflexive anaphor taan. (It is taan in Tamil and Malayalam, taanu in Kannada and tanu in Telugu.) As is the case with other long-distance anaphors, it is subject-oriented; it is also [+human] and third person. Interestingly, it is infelicitous if bound within the minimal clause when it is an argument of the verb. (That is, it seems to obey Principle B of the binding theory.) Although it is subject-oriented in the normal case, it can be bound by a non-subject if the verb is a “psych predicate,” that is, a predicate that denotes a feeling; in this case, it can be bound by the experiencer of the feeling. Again, in a discourse that depicts the thoughts, feelings, or point of view of a protagonist—the so-called “logophoric contexts”—it can be coreferential with the protagonist even if the latter is mentioned only in the preceding discourse (not within the sentence). These latter facts suggest that the anaphor is in fact coindexed with the perspective of the clause (rather than with the subject per se). In cases where this anaphor needs to be coindexed with the minimal subject (to express a meaning like ‘John loves himself’), the Dravidian languages exhibit two strategies to circumvent the Principle B effect. Malayalam adds an emphasis marker tanne to the anaphor; taan tanne can corefer with the minimal subject. This strategy parallels the strategy of European languages and East Asian languages (cf. Scandinavian seg selv). The three other major Dravidian languages—Tamil, Telugu, and Kannada—use a verbal reflexive: they add a light verb koL- (lit. ‘take’) to the verbal complex, which has the effect of reflexivizing the transitive predicate. (It either makes the verb intransitive or gives it a self-benefactive meaning.) The Dravidian languages also have reciprocal and distributive anaphors. These have bipartite structures. An example of a Malayalam reciprocal anaphor is oral … matte aaL (‘one person … other person’). The distributive anaphor in Malayalam has the form awar-awar (‘they-they’); it is a reduplicated pronoun. The reciprocals and distributives are strict anaphors in the sense that they apparently obey Principle A; they must be bound in the domain of the minimal subject. They are not subject-oriented. A noteworthy fact about the pronominal system of Dravidian is that the third person pronouns come in proximal-distal pairs, the proximal pronoun being used to refer to something nearby and the distal pronoun being used elsewhere.
Title: Anaphora in Dravidian
Description:
Abstract The Dravidian languages have a long-distance reflexive anaphor taan.
(It is taan in Tamil and Malayalam, taanu in Kannada and tanu in Telugu.
) As is the case with other long-distance anaphors, it is subject-oriented; it is also [+human] and third person.
Interestingly, it is infelicitous if bound within the minimal clause when it is an argument of the verb.
(That is, it seems to obey Principle B of the binding theory.
) Although it is subject-oriented in the normal case, it can be bound by a non-subject if the verb is a “psych predicate,” that is, a predicate that denotes a feeling; in this case, it can be bound by the experiencer of the feeling.
Again, in a discourse that depicts the thoughts, feelings, or point of view of a protagonist—the so-called “logophoric contexts”—it can be coreferential with the protagonist even if the latter is mentioned only in the preceding discourse (not within the sentence).
These latter facts suggest that the anaphor is in fact coindexed with the perspective of the clause (rather than with the subject per se).
In cases where this anaphor needs to be coindexed with the minimal subject (to express a meaning like ‘John loves himself’), the Dravidian languages exhibit two strategies to circumvent the Principle B effect.
Malayalam adds an emphasis marker tanne to the anaphor; taan tanne can corefer with the minimal subject.
This strategy parallels the strategy of European languages and East Asian languages (cf.
Scandinavian seg selv).
The three other major Dravidian languages—Tamil, Telugu, and Kannada—use a verbal reflexive: they add a light verb koL- (lit.
‘take’) to the verbal complex, which has the effect of reflexivizing the transitive predicate.
(It either makes the verb intransitive or gives it a self-benefactive meaning.
) The Dravidian languages also have reciprocal and distributive anaphors.
These have bipartite structures.
An example of a Malayalam reciprocal anaphor is oral … matte aaL (‘one person … other person’).
The distributive anaphor in Malayalam has the form awar-awar (‘they-they’); it is a reduplicated pronoun.
The reciprocals and distributives are strict anaphors in the sense that they apparently obey Principle A; they must be bound in the domain of the minimal subject.
They are not subject-oriented.
A noteworthy fact about the pronominal system of Dravidian is that the third person pronouns come in proximal-distal pairs, the proximal pronoun being used to refer to something nearby and the distal pronoun being used elsewhere.

Related Results

Anaphora With Non-nominal Antecedents in Computational Linguistics: a Survey
Anaphora With Non-nominal Antecedents in Computational Linguistics: a Survey
This article provides an extensive overview of the literature related to the phenomenon of non-nominal-antecedent anaphora (also known as abstract anaphora or discourse deixis), a ...
Rice in Dravidian
Rice in Dravidian
AbstractThe Dravidian languages, now spoken mainly in peninsular India, form one of two main branches of the Zagrosian language family, whose other main branch consists of Elamitic...
Anaphora Resolution
Anaphora Resolution
This chapter provides a theoretical background of anaphora and introduces the varieties of this pervasive linguistic phenomenon. Next, it defines the task of anaphora resolution an...
Machine Translation on Dravidian Languages
Machine Translation on Dravidian Languages
The Dravidian languages are spoken all over the world. Despite their distinctiveness, Dravidian languages haven’t gotten much attention because there aren’t enough resources to han...
Dravidian Futurities: A Creative Process
Dravidian Futurities: A Creative Process
In this article, author and artist Meena Murugesan analyzes their creative process and research in the making of Dravidian Futurities, a multi-channel video installation with live ...

Back to Top