Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries

View through CrossRef
AbstractEfficient project execution is a key business objective in many domains and particularly so for capital projects in the process industries, but existing project management research gives little direction about how project team factors influence three important capital project outcomes: cost, schedule, and operability. After an extensive cross‐disciplinary review of the general team and project management literatures, we constructed and tested a theoretically based, five‐dimensional model of organizational context, project team design, project team leadership, project team processes, and project outcome factors. We examined the model by means of an empirical study of 56 newly completed capital projects executed by 15 Fortune 500 companies in the process industries. The results indicate the value of disaggregating project outcomes for research purposes. Different bundles of project team factors were found to drive project cost, schedule, and operability. Project team efficacy, cross‐functional project teams, autonomous project team structure, and virtual office usage were the strongest predictors of project cost effectiveness. Continuity of project leadership, cross‐functional project teams, and project manager incentives were the strongest predictors of project construction schedule. In contrast, clear project goals and an office design to facilitate effective communication were the main predictors of plant operability. Implications of these findings for researchers and project practitioners are discussed. One major practical implication of our findings is that project managers need to clearly focus and prioritize their goals for each project so they can adopt the appropriate bundles of project team practices that will facilitate their goal achievement.
Title: Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries
Description:
AbstractEfficient project execution is a key business objective in many domains and particularly so for capital projects in the process industries, but existing project management research gives little direction about how project team factors influence three important capital project outcomes: cost, schedule, and operability.
After an extensive cross‐disciplinary review of the general team and project management literatures, we constructed and tested a theoretically based, five‐dimensional model of organizational context, project team design, project team leadership, project team processes, and project outcome factors.
We examined the model by means of an empirical study of 56 newly completed capital projects executed by 15 Fortune 500 companies in the process industries.
The results indicate the value of disaggregating project outcomes for research purposes.
Different bundles of project team factors were found to drive project cost, schedule, and operability.
Project team efficacy, cross‐functional project teams, autonomous project team structure, and virtual office usage were the strongest predictors of project cost effectiveness.
Continuity of project leadership, cross‐functional project teams, and project manager incentives were the strongest predictors of project construction schedule.
In contrast, clear project goals and an office design to facilitate effective communication were the main predictors of plant operability.
Implications of these findings for researchers and project practitioners are discussed.
One major practical implication of our findings is that project managers need to clearly focus and prioritize their goals for each project so they can adopt the appropriate bundles of project team practices that will facilitate their goal achievement.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Team Monitoring, Does it Matter for Team Performance? Moderating role of Team Monitoring on Team Psychological Safety and Team Learning
Team Monitoring, Does it Matter for Team Performance? Moderating role of Team Monitoring on Team Psychological Safety and Team Learning
Introduction: The use of work teams is a strategy that allows organizations to move faster and more proactively. Team performance is an interesting issue that needs to be studied m...
Intellectual Capital and the Performance of Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia
Intellectual Capital and the Performance of Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia
ARTICLE INFO  ABSTRACT Keywords:Intellectual capital, value added capital employed, value added human capital, structural capital value added, return on asset, return on equity, ma...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
Team management for fast projects: an empirical study of process industries
Team management for fast projects: an empirical study of process industries
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to set out to identify key team factors associated with the fast implementation of capital projects. Although scholars theorise that project suc...
Team reflections, team mental models and team performance over time
Team reflections, team mental models and team performance over time
Purpose Although previous research proved positive impacts of team reflection on team outcomes, especially team performance and innovation, there are only a few insights in to whic...
So you think you know what drives disbursements at the IDB? Think, think again...
So you think you know what drives disbursements at the IDB? Think, think again...
This paper focuses on the performance of IDB projects between 1996 and 2011 disbursements. We present evidence on the evolution of disbursements with respect to the available funds...

Back to Top