Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Accuracy of D-Dimers to diagnose aortic dissection and its different types keeping CT angiogram as gold standard.

View through CrossRef
Objective: To determine diagnostic accuracy of D-dimers levels to diagnose aortic dissection and its different types keeping computed tomographic angiogram as gold standard. Study Design: Cross-sectional Validation study. Setting: Department of Vascular Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi. Period: 1st December 2023 to 31st May 2024. Methods: Patients presenting with acute onset “tearing” chest pain with suspicion of aortic dissection were included in the study. Their D-dimer levels and CT angiography were performed in all patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of D-dimers to diagnose aortic dissection were calculated. Data was analyzed using SPSS 22. Results: A total number of 74 patients were included in this study. In this study, sensitivity of D-dimer levels to diagnose aortic dissection was 90.00% while specificity was 71.43%. For aortic dissection diagnosis positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of D-dimers levels were 93.10%, 62.50% and 86.49%, respectively. Based on CT Angiogram, there were 47 (63.51%) Stanford type A – Aortic dissection patients while 27 (36.49%) patients were of Stanford type B – Aortic dissection. In Stanford type A – Aortic dissection patients’ sensitivity and specificity were 95% and 41% while in Stanford type B – aortic dissection patients’ sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 22.22%. Accuracy of D-dimers levels to diagnose Type A – Aortic dissection and Type B – Aortic dissection was 70.27% & 37.84% respectively. Conclusion: D-dimers levels can serve as an effective tool to diagnose aortic dissection, in particular for Stanford Type A – Aortic dissection.
Title: Accuracy of D-Dimers to diagnose aortic dissection and its different types keeping CT angiogram as gold standard.
Description:
Objective: To determine diagnostic accuracy of D-dimers levels to diagnose aortic dissection and its different types keeping computed tomographic angiogram as gold standard.
Study Design: Cross-sectional Validation study.
Setting: Department of Vascular Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi.
Period: 1st December 2023 to 31st May 2024.
Methods: Patients presenting with acute onset “tearing” chest pain with suspicion of aortic dissection were included in the study.
Their D-dimer levels and CT angiography were performed in all patients.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of D-dimers to diagnose aortic dissection were calculated.
Data was analyzed using SPSS 22.
Results: A total number of 74 patients were included in this study.
In this study, sensitivity of D-dimer levels to diagnose aortic dissection was 90.
00% while specificity was 71.
43%.
For aortic dissection diagnosis positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of D-dimers levels were 93.
10%, 62.
50% and 86.
49%, respectively.
Based on CT Angiogram, there were 47 (63.
51%) Stanford type A – Aortic dissection patients while 27 (36.
49%) patients were of Stanford type B – Aortic dissection.
In Stanford type A – Aortic dissection patients’ sensitivity and specificity were 95% and 41% while in Stanford type B – aortic dissection patients’ sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 22.
22%.
Accuracy of D-dimers levels to diagnose Type A – Aortic dissection and Type B – Aortic dissection was 70.
27% & 37.
84% respectively.
Conclusion: D-dimers levels can serve as an effective tool to diagnose aortic dissection, in particular for Stanford Type A – Aortic dissection.

Related Results

Aortic Aneurysm
Aortic Aneurysm
Aortic diseases are relatively rare but are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Emergency physicians (EPs) should consider aortic disease in all patients with pain in the...
Aortic Aneurysm
Aortic Aneurysm
Aortic diseases are relatively rare but are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Emergency physicians (EPs) should consider aortic disease in all patients with pain in the...
Clinical Features of Pregnancy-Associated Aortic Dissection and Pregnancy Outcomes
Clinical Features of Pregnancy-Associated Aortic Dissection and Pregnancy Outcomes
Abstract Background Pregnancy complicated by aortic dissection is a rare and severe condition. Due to limited clinical experience, there are currently no standardiz...
Decreased expression of fibulin-4 in aortic wall of aortic dissection
Decreased expression of fibulin-4 in aortic wall of aortic dissection
In this research, we will examine the expression of Fibulin-4 in aortic wall to find out its role in aortic dissection development. The samples of aortic wall were obtained from 10...
Blood pressure, hypertension, and the risk of aortic aneurysm in the UK Biobank
Blood pressure, hypertension, and the risk of aortic aneurysm in the UK Biobank
Abstract Background Although an association between elevated blood pressure and risk of aortic aneurysm is established, f...
A contemporary approach to a young female patient with Loeys-Dietz syndrome and an uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a case report
A contemporary approach to a young female patient with Loeys-Dietz syndrome and an uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a case report
Abstract Background Aortic dissection is a relatively uncommon, but often catastrophic disease that requires early and accurate diagnosis. It often presents in patients with congen...

Back to Top