Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Combined Ventilation of Two Subjects with a Single Mechanical Ventilator Using a New Medical Device: An In Vitro Study
View through CrossRef
Introduction. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has created a sudden lack of ventilators. DuplicARⓇ is a novel device that allows simultaneous and independent ventilation of two subjects with a single ventilator. The aims of this study are (a) to determine the efficacy of DuplicARⓇ to independently regulate the peak and positive-end expiratory pressures in each subject, both under pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation and (b) to determine the ventilation mode in which DuplicARⓇ presents the best performance and safety. Materials and Methods. Two test lungs are connected to a single ventilator using DuplicARⓇ. Three experimental stages are established: (1) two identical subjects, (2) two subjects with the same weight but different lung compliance, and (3) two subjects with different weights and lung compliances. In each stage, the test lungs are ventilated in two ventilation modes. The positive-end expiratory pressure requirements are increased successively in one of the subjects. The goal is to achieve a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg for each subject in all different stages through manipulation of the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ controllers. Results. DuplicARⓇ allows adequate ventilation of two subjects with different weights and/or lung compliances and/or PEEP requirements. This is achieved by adjusting the total tidal volume for both subjects (in volume-controlled ventilation) or the highest peak pressure needed (in pressure-controlled ventilation) along with the basal positive-end expiratory pressure on the ventilator and simultaneously manipulating the DuplicARⓇ controllers to decrease the tidal volume or the peak pressure in the subject that needs less and/or to increase the positive-end expiratory pressure in the subject that needs more. While ventilatory goals can be achieved in any of the ventilation modes, DuplicARⓇ performs better in pressure-controlled ventilation, as changes experienced in the variables of one subject do not modify the other one. Conclusions. DuplicARⓇ is an effective tool to manage the peak inspiratory pressure and the positive-end expiratory pressure independently in two subjects connected to a single ventilator. The driving pressure can be adjusted to meet the requirements of subjects with different weights and lung compliances. Pressure-controlled ventilation has advantages over volume-controlled ventilation and is therefore the recommended ventilation mode.
Title: Combined Ventilation of Two Subjects with a Single Mechanical Ventilator Using a New Medical Device: An In Vitro Study
Description:
Introduction.
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has created a sudden lack of ventilators.
DuplicARⓇ is a novel device that allows simultaneous and independent ventilation of two subjects with a single ventilator.
The aims of this study are (a) to determine the efficacy of DuplicARⓇ to independently regulate the peak and positive-end expiratory pressures in each subject, both under pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation and (b) to determine the ventilation mode in which DuplicARⓇ presents the best performance and safety.
Materials and Methods.
Two test lungs are connected to a single ventilator using DuplicARⓇ.
Three experimental stages are established: (1) two identical subjects, (2) two subjects with the same weight but different lung compliance, and (3) two subjects with different weights and lung compliances.
In each stage, the test lungs are ventilated in two ventilation modes.
The positive-end expiratory pressure requirements are increased successively in one of the subjects.
The goal is to achieve a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg for each subject in all different stages through manipulation of the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ controllers.
Results.
DuplicARⓇ allows adequate ventilation of two subjects with different weights and/or lung compliances and/or PEEP requirements.
This is achieved by adjusting the total tidal volume for both subjects (in volume-controlled ventilation) or the highest peak pressure needed (in pressure-controlled ventilation) along with the basal positive-end expiratory pressure on the ventilator and simultaneously manipulating the DuplicARⓇ controllers to decrease the tidal volume or the peak pressure in the subject that needs less and/or to increase the positive-end expiratory pressure in the subject that needs more.
While ventilatory goals can be achieved in any of the ventilation modes, DuplicARⓇ performs better in pressure-controlled ventilation, as changes experienced in the variables of one subject do not modify the other one.
Conclusions.
DuplicARⓇ is an effective tool to manage the peak inspiratory pressure and the positive-end expiratory pressure independently in two subjects connected to a single ventilator.
The driving pressure can be adjusted to meet the requirements of subjects with different weights and lung compliances.
Pressure-controlled ventilation has advantages over volume-controlled ventilation and is therefore the recommended ventilation mode.
Related Results
Adaptive split ventilator system enables parallel ventilation, individual monitoring and ventilation pressures control for each lung simulators
Adaptive split ventilator system enables parallel ventilation, individual monitoring and ventilation pressures control for each lung simulators
Abstract
Objective
In mass crisis setting such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients requiring ...
Electronic Computer-Based Model of Combined Ventilation Using a New Medical Device
Electronic Computer-Based Model of Combined Ventilation Using a New Medical Device
Abstract
Introduction
The increased demand for mechanical ventilation caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic could generate a critic...
Critical care nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward using ventilator waveform monitoring to detect patient-ventilator asynchrony: A cross-sectional online survey
Critical care nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward using ventilator waveform monitoring to detect patient-ventilator asynchrony: A cross-sectional online survey
Abstract
Background
Most mechanically ventilated patients will be exposed to some asynchrony with the ventilator. Inability to detect and manage patient-ventilator asynchr...
A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs
A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs
Background. The global crisis situation caused by SARS-CoV-2 has created an explosive demand for ventilators, which cannot be met even in developed countries. Designing a simple an...
Advanced Modes of Mechanical Ventilation
Advanced Modes of Mechanical Ventilation
Advanced modes of mechanical ventilation emerged from the need for better control of the ventilator by the patient, the possibility of respiratory mechanics and respiratory drive m...
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Duration Prediction using Survival Analysis
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Duration Prediction using Survival Analysis
Abstract
Invasive mechanical ventilation is one of the leading life support machines in the intensive care unit (ICU). By identifying the predictors of ventilation ...
Performance of the Oxylog® 1000 portable ventilator in a hyperbaric environment
Performance of the Oxylog® 1000 portable ventilator in a hyperbaric environment
Introduction: The management of mechanically ventilated patients in the hyperbaric environment requires knowledge of how the physical properties of gases change under pressure and ...
TU‐H‐202‐02: Applications, Validation, Clinical Endpoints and Opportunities for CT Ventilation
TU‐H‐202‐02: Applications, Validation, Clinical Endpoints and Opportunities for CT Ventilation
CT ventilation imaging is an exciting functional imaging modality that combines four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and deformable image registration (DIR) to provide exqui...

